Template site builders
Drag and drop tools look friendly and they have their place. In practice many end up slow, overloaded, and hard to debug when something misfires. The focus is features, not foundations.
- Lots of moving parts behind a simple editor.
- Performance that depends on how many extras you toggle on.
- Limited control over logs, headers, and routing.
Generic agency builds
A glossy pitch, a premium theme, and a long list of plug ins. On launch day it looks smart. Two years later it is brittle, slow, and nobody is quite sure what happens if you update anything.
- Heavily themed WordPress or similar platforms.
- Plugin chains that hide where problems start.
- Hosting chosen for cost, not clarity or control.
Mate who knows computers
The cheapest option at the start. Often the most expensive later. You inherit a one off build that lives in their head, with few notes, no governance, and no clear plan for handover.
- Little or no documentation.
- Hard to move providers without breaking things.
- No clear logging trail when something odd happens.
Big framework overkill
JavaScript heavy sites that look impressive on a design deck but fight the devices and connections many of your users rely on. Great for complex products, less helpful for local services.
- Complex build chains that few people can maintain.
- Performance tied to bundle size and caching quirks.
- Often more surface for attackers to poke at.
There are excellent teams working inside all of those models, but the incentives are different. Ki-Ki is built for small organisations that need something steadier and less theatrical.